Journal of the stylistic of Persian poem and prose
volume Number 14، number In Volume 5، August 2021 ، issue Number 63

Investigation of the event in khaghani poems

Marzieh Rahmani , Hengameh Ashouri (Author in Charge), Soraya Razeghi

Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: One of the most important discussions in simile is the pseudo-face discussion, based on which one can notice the innovation or imitation of the artist. The pseudo-face expresses the breadth of the poet"s imagination and the indicator of his new mental world. The simile is divided into allegorical aspects in terms of being compound and singular, closeness and nostalgia, real and imaginary, unity and plurality, allegorical and non-allegorical, vulgar and unlikely, research and imaginative, and single and multiple. The pseudo-face is also divided according to grammar. In Khaghani"s poems, the aspects of doubts are very diverse. Khaghani has created this diversity by using imaginative aspects. Since in traditional rhetoric the relationship between pseudo-face and two elements of simile is not discussed, in this article, based on Gutli"s division, a new classification of pseudo-face is discussed in Khaghani"s Divan in order to answer the question of how to use pseudo-face in How is Khaghani"s divan related to "similar" and "similar"? Is there a specific pattern for the pseudonym in his divan? Which ultimately leads to the achievement of the purpose of the article or the achievement of Khaghani stylistic features in the use of pseudonyms.
METHODOLOGY: The method of this research is descriptive-analytical.
FINDINGS: Most of Khaghani"s similes are imaginary. Although the aspect of Khaghani"s suspicions in some verses is imaginative for both "similar" and "similar" elements, but these verses are not very numerous and are not considered as Khaghani"s stylistic features; On the other hand, the aspect of suspicions that is real for one of the imaginary elements and real or expected for the other element, is considered as one of the characteristics of Khaghani"s style because it has the majority of similes.
CONCLUSION: The face of Khaghani"s doubts is in many cases the present face of doubts that gives character to "similar" or "similar" or that is interpreted in relation to similar. In Khaghani"s poetry, we seldom come across verses that cannot be found in the form of character, forgiveness and symbolic interpretation. Khaghani has used the employment industry in a different way and has paid more attention to the virtual meanings of the words so that we can consider the use of this feature as one of the features of Khaghani style.

Keyword
Khaghani , Pseudo-face , Simile , Light feature , Guttierez table.

• Abu Adib, Kamal. (2005). Research in the Images of Jorjani Imagination, Translated by Farzan Sojudi and Farhan Sasani, Tehran: Center for Art Studies and Research, p. 138.
• Barzegar Khaleghi, Mohammad Reza. (2008). Description of Divan Khaghani, Tehran: Zavvar.
• Brook rose, christinne. (1965). Grammar of metaphor, secker and walburg.
• Dehkhoda, Ali Akbar. (1998). Dictionary, under the supervision of Mohammad Moein and Seyed Jafar Shahidi, Tehran: University of Tehran.
• Goatly, Andrew. (1998). The language of metaphor, Routledge, London.
• https://scholars.In.edu.hk/en/.persons/andrew-peter-goatly.
• Jorjani, Abdul Qahir. (1982). Asrar al-Balaghah, Translated by Jalil Tajlil, Tehran: University of Tehran. Pournamdarian, Taghi and Mahozi, Amir Hossein.
• (2008).
• Investigation of pseudo-face in Shams, Tehran: University of Tehran.
• Shamisa, Sirus. (2011). Explanations and meanings, Vol. 3, Tehran: Mitra, p. 42.
• Taftazani, Massoud. (1407 AH). Al-Motaval, Explanation of Mirsaid Sharif, Qom: Al-Dawari School, p. 148.