- Count View : 25
- آدرس کوتاه شده مقاله: https://bahareadab.com/article_id/1971
- کد IranDOI مقاله: IranDOI :10.irandoi.2002/bahareadab.2026 .19 .8067
volume Number : 19
number In Volume : 1
issue Number : 119
Journal of the stylistic of Persian poem and prose
volume Number 19،
number In Volume 1،
،
issue Number 119
Analysis of the Rhetorical Purposes of the Call and the Monaada in Tarikh-e Vassaf
Ziba Azhir , Barat Mohammadi (Author in Charge), Abbas Baghinezhad
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The rhetoric of the call and the manaada is considered one of the effective linguistic tools in creating semantic diversity and inducing secondary purposes in literary texts. Tarikh-e Vassaf, as one of the most prominent examples of fabricated and commissioned prose of the Ilkhanid period, provides a suitable context for examining the rhetorical functions of this linguistic structure. The aim of the present study is to analyze the methods of using the call and the manaada and explain its secondary rhetorical purposes in Tarikh-e Vassaf.
METHODOLOGY: This study was conducted in a descriptive-analytical manner and based on library studies. The data were collected through document analysis and extraction of examples of the call and the manaada from the text of four volumes of Tarikh-e Vassaf and then analyzed based on the principles of classical rhetoric.
FINDINGS: The research findings show that Wassaf al-Hadra consciously and purposefully used rhetorical techniques throughout his work and used the call and the manaada to enhance the emotional and persuasive aspects of the text. The explicit use of the word call in many cases, in addition to creating a sense of urgency and harmony with the traditional and formal style of Ilkhanid prose, has enabled the direct transmission of the author"s emotions and highlighting his intended semantic intentions.
CONCLUSION: The research results indicate that in Wassaf"s history, the call and the manaada have various functions such as informing and reporting, requesting and requesting, reprimanding and blaming, expressing happiness and gratitude, encouraging, persuading, and seizing the opportunity. Also, by consciously presenting and delaying the call and the manaada in the construction of the sentence, Wassaf sought to emphasize the meaning and instill a special emotional charge, and in this way, he strengthened the rhetorical role of this linguistic structure in advancing his discursive purposes.
Keyword
Tarikh-e Vassaf. Wassaf Shirazi. Rhetoric. Secondary purpose
- Amirkhanloo. Masoumeh (2018). “Stylistics of Idiomatic Sentences in Hafez’s Ghazals”. Specialized Quarterly Journal of Persian Poetry and Prose Stylistics (Bahar Adab). Year 11. Issue 1. Serial 39. pp. 43-58.
- Anvari. Hassan and Givi. Hassan (2016). Persian Grammar. 2 vols. 12th edition. Tehran: Fatemi, pp. 119-120.
- Azar Hazin. Mehdi and Miladi. Fereshteh (2019). “Comparison of the Rhetorical Function of Idioms in the Mysteries of Monotheism and the Raggedy Pillars Based on the Meta-Ideological Role”. Kohnnameh Adab Parsi. Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies. Two Scientific-Research Quarterly Journals. Year 10. Issue 1. pp. 3-37.
- Azari-Torbat. Fatemeh et al. (2019). “Investigation of structural techniques and content of description in historical texts, case study: Tarikh Jahangosha and Tarikh Wassaf al-Hadra”. Stylistics of Persian Poetry and Prose (Bahar Adab). Volume 16. Serial 89. pp. 10-17.
- Bahar. Mohammad Taqi (1977). Stylistics. Third edition. Tehran: Amir Kabir, p. 100.
- Pournamdarian. Taqi (2008). “Rhetoric and Dialogue of the Text”. Literary Criticism. Issue 1. pp. 11-37.
- Jorjani. Abdul Qahir (2004). Reasons for the Miracles in the Quran. Translation and Summary: Seyyed Mohammad Radmanesh. Tehran: Shahnameh Pajoohi, pp. 38-39.
- Khayampour. Abdul Rasool (2005). Persian Grammar. Fourteenth edition. Tabriz: Sotoudeh.
- Rajai. Mohammad Khalil (2013). Ma'alem al-Balagha in the science of meanings, speech and originality. Fourth edition. Shiraz: Shiraz University Publishing Center, pp. 160-161.
- Rastegar-Fasaei. Mansour (2001). Types of Persian prose. Tehran: Samat, p. 158.
- Razavi. Seyyed Abul-Fazl. Hojabrian. Hossein (2021). "Criticism and study of the book Life, Time and Historiography of Wassaf Shirazi". Critical research journal of humanities and cultural studies texts and programs, Scientific Monthly. Year 21. No. 21. pp. 145-166.
- Shari'at. Mohammad Javad (1996). Persian grammar. Seventh edition. Tehran: Asatir, p. 33.
- Shafaii. Ahmad (1984). Scientific foundations of Persian grammar. Tehran: Novin, p. 89.
- Safa. Zabihullah (2022). History of literature in Iran. Eight volumes. Twenty-second edition. Tehran: Ferdows, p. 1261.
- Safavi. Kourosh (2015). From Linguistics to Literature. Vol. 1. Fifth edition. Tehran: Surah Mehr, p. 35.
- Irfan. Hossein (2004). Borders (Explanation and Persian Translation of the Brief Dictionary of the Meanings). Two volumes. Fourth edition. Qom: Hijrat, p. 346.
- Alavi Moghadam. Mohammad and Ashrafzadeh. Reza (2008). Meanings and Expression. Tehran: Samt, pp. 58-66-67-71.
- Alizadeh. Nasser and Roohi Kiasar. Azam (2019). "Rhetorical Aspects of the Syntactic Element of Neda in the Poems of the Third Brothers". Journal of Linguistic and Rhetorical Studies. Year 11. No. 21. pp. 275-300.
- Qasemzadeh. Seyyed Ali and Hatami. Saeed (2011). "Intertextual Analysis of Literary Features of the Prose of the History of the World Explorer and the History of the World Explorer". Specialized Quarterly Journal of Persian Poetry and Prose Stylistics (Bahar Adab). Year 4. Issue 4. Series 14. pp. 77-94.
- Garib. Abdol Azim and Others (1999). Persian Grammar (Five Masters). Second Edition. Tehran: Ferdows, pp. 44-57.
- Mohammadi. Masoumeh and Others (2017). "Criticism and Study of Neda in Persian and Arabic Rhetoric". Journal of Criticism and Rhetoric. Year 6. Issue 2. pp. 185-202.
- Mahmoudi. Azadeh and Jabbari. Najm al-Din (2024). "A Comparative Introduction to the Rhetorical Structures of Introduction and Delay in Literature and Calligraphy". Grammatical and Rhetorical Research. Volume 14. Issue 26. pp. 40-62.
- Moradi. Mohammad Hadi and Kazemi. Fatemeh (2016). “The Significance of Presentation and Delay in the Context of Negation and Affirmation from the Perspective of Abdul Qahir Jorjani”. Research Journal of Literary Criticism and Rhetoric. Year 5. Issue 1. pp. 91-109.
- Natel Khanlari. Parviz (2003). Persian Grammar, 18th Edition. Tehran: Toos, p. 77.
- Wassaf (Shirazi). Shahab al-Din Abdullah (1959). Tarikh-e Vassaf (known as the Bombay edition: 1269 AH). Tehran: Ibn Sina and Jafari Tabrizi Library.
- __________________________________ (2022). Analysis of Al-Amsar and Tajziyyah Al-Aasar (Tarikh-e Vassaf). By Ahmad Khatami. Six volumes. Tehran: Alam.
- Homaei. Jalal al-Din (1994). Meanings and Expression. Second edition. Tehran: Homa Publishing Company, p. 88.
- ________________ (2012). Rhetoric and Literary Crafts. Thirty-second edition. Tehran: Sokhan (Homa Publishing Company), p. 10.