Journal of the stylistic of Persian poem and prose
volume Number 14، number In Volume 5، August 2021 ، issue Number 63

The debate in texts in 4th and 5th century (Theology encyclopedia), Nowruznameh, Kimiaye Saadat

Nahideh Zarei (Author in Charge), Ali Taslimi , Mohammad Khazaneh Darloo

Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Analysis of the debate has main contents and theories which each may be effective for analysis of encyclopedia, Nowruznameh, Kimiaye Saadat. The debate studies are important for showing a methodical relation between social, political and religious views of critics. Among this, the Ernesto Laclau and Chantal Muffle debates which are closer to the Foucault one globally and also Fairleigh debate may be used. Study of Avicenna, Khayam and Ghazali debates provides possibility of challenging inclusive debate ruling on effect and evolution of stabilized system of its concepts by determining meaningful relation of the text.
METHODOLOGY: The present research is a descriptive-analytical study which has been performed by library method. In this research, the formation of the debate which is used by these three writers are analyzed by approach of debate analysis.
FINDINGS: This study shows that the Avicenna debate in proving Asity is a philosophical-rational debate relying on reasoning. Khayam debate is a cultural-material debate which plays a fundamental role in reproduction of Nowruznameh debate. Ghazali debate has a mystical trend.
CONCLUSION: Although these three debates are in contrast with each other, but the Khayam broad-minded debate is in contrast with the Avicenna and Ghazali broad-minded debates and the Avicenna and Ghazali debates are in contrast with each other. Among these three debates, the dominant Ghazali debate, with overstatement and boycott mechanism, rejects two other debates and features its debate as dominant and best power.

Keyword
encyclopedia , Nowruznameh , Kimiaye Saadat , analysis of debate , dominant debate , religious and worldly affairs.

• The Holy Quran.
• Adam, jaworski & coupled, Nikolas. (1999). The Discourse Reader Route, p.3.
• Aghagolzadeh, Ferdows. (2015). Critical Discourse Analysis, Third Edition, Tehran: Scientific and Cultural Publications.
• Amadi, Abolfath .(2013). Ghorar al-Hakam, author of Seyed Hashem Rasooli Mahalaei, 13th edition, Tehran: Farhang Publisher Office.
• Aristotle. (1984). The complete works of Aristotle, Barnes, (ed), u.s,princenton university press, p98.
• Coupland, N.& Jaworsski, A. (1999). the discourse reader, London Routledge, p159.
• Dashti, Mohammad. (2001). Nahj al-Balaghah, Ch 1, Qom: Mashhu, P. 428.
• Fairclough, Norman. (2010). Critical Analysis of Discourse, Translated by Fatemeh Shayesteh Piran, Third Edition, Tehran: Ministry of Culture and Islamic Guidance, p. 162.
• Foucault, Michel. (1977). The political function of the intellectual, Radical philosophy, pp. 12-14.
• Ghazali, Mohammad. (2014). The Alchemy of Happiness, by Hossein Khadiv Jam, 16th edition, Tehran: Scientific and Cultural Publications, p. 234.
• Homayi, Jalaluddin. (2019). Ghazalinameh, Tehran: Zavvar, p. 18.
• Ibn Sina, Abu Ali Hussein Ibn Abdullah. (2015). Alaei Encyclopedia, Introduction, Margins and Corrections of Mohammad Moein, Mohammad Mashkoot, Taqi Binesh, Tehran: Mola, p.432.
• Jurgens, Marian & Phillips, Louise. (2015). Theory and Method in Discourse Analysis, translated by Hadi Jalili, third edition, Tehran: Ney Publisher, p. 35.
• Khayyam, Omar. (2013). Nowruznameh, Ch 3, edited by Mojtaba Minavi, Tehran: Asatir.
• Majlisi, Mohammad Baqer. (2007). Bihar Al-Anwar, translated by Musa Hamedani, Volume 5, Fourth Edition, Tehran: Islamic Publications, p. 100.
• Mills, Sara. (2009). Discourse, translated by Fattah Mohammadi, second edition, Zanjan: third millennium. p. 29.
• Paya, Ali. (1997). The place of the concept of truth in Foucault's views, Letter of Culture, No. 33, pp. 69-52.
• Salbia, Jamil. (1987). Philosophical Culture, Vol. 1, translated by Manouchehr Sanei Darreh Bidi, Tehran: Hekmat, p. 463.
• Shirazi, Sadr al-Din Muhammad. (1981). The Wisdom of the Transcendent, Vol. III, Beirut: Dar al-Ahyaa for Arab Heritage, p. 83.
• Soltani, Ali Asghar. (2005). Power, Discourse and Language, Tehran: Ney, p. 107.
• Tabarsi, Hassan Ibn Fazl. (1989). Makarem Akhlaq, translated by Ibrahim Mirbagheri, Qom: Habib Publications, p. 146.
• Vandik. (2010). Studies in Discourse Analysis, Ch III, Tehran: Ministry of Culture and Islamic Guidance, p.18.
• Zeymaran, Mohammad. (2018). Michel Foucault: Knowledge and Power, Ch 9, Tehran: Hermes, p. 51.