Journal of the stylistic of Persian poem and prose
Article Info
Journal of the stylistic of Persian poem and prose شماره 117

volume Number : 18
number In Volume : 11
issue Number : 117

Journal of the stylistic of Persian poem and prose
volume Number 18، number In Volume 11، ، issue Number 117

Analysis of the Short Story “Why Was the Sea Stormy?” Based on Julia Kristeva’s Theory of Abjection

Behnam Kiani Shahvandi , Asad Abshirini (Author in Charge), Adel Sawaedi

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: This study analyzes Sadegh Chubak’s short story “Why Was the Sea Stormy?” based on Julia Kristeva’s notion of abjection. Throughout the analysis, abject phenomena such as sexual and moral corruption, death, addiction, disease, and illegitimacy are examined. The focus is also on how the abject constantly invades the subjects’ lives, and how these subjects, in turn, attempt to preserve their boundaries and purify themselves from contamination.

METHODOLOGY: This research is a theoretical study conducted through a library-based methodology and employs content analysis as its main approach. The corpus of the study is the short story “Why Was the Sea Stormy?” from Chubak’s short story collection “The Baboon Whose Buffoon Was Dead.”

FINDINGS: In “Why Was the Sea Stormy?” there is a frequent presence of abject elements such as death, addiction, disease, and sexual or moral corruption. By examining the characters in this story, their ongoing confrontation with these abject forces and their attempts to escape and cleanse themselves become apparent.

CONCLUSION: The findings reveal that the main characters of this naturalistic story strive for subjectivity and inner purification. Kohzad and Zivar, through love, become aware of their own contamination and endeavor to free themselves from it through spiritual cleansing. A prominent instance of this effort is Kohzad’s distancing himself from other drivers and the symbolic act of pouring ablution water over Zivar’s head before marrying her.

Keyword
Naturalism , Abjection , Julia Kristeva , Sadegh Chubak

Reference
  • Abshirani, Asad. (2019). “An Analysis of the Process of Meaning-Making in the Real-Natural Prose of Chubak with a Focus on ‘Why Was the Sea Stormy?’” Journal of Persian Language and Literature, Vol. 27(87), pp. 7–32.
  • Ardalan, Bakhtiar & Laleh, Nader. (2001). The Sense of Unity. Tehran: Khashak.
  • Aminian, Ma’soumeh. (2016). An Analysis of Sadegh Chubak’s Short Story Collections. Tehran: Madid.
  • Babasalar, Asghar. (2006). “Sadegh Chubak and the Critique of His Works.” Journal of Literature and Humanities, University of Tehran, Vol. 57(1), pp. 133–152.
  • Baraheni, Reza. (1991). Story Writing. 4th ed. Tehran: Alborz.
  • Barrett, Estelle. (2018). Kristeva Reframed. Trans. Mehrdad Parsa. Tehran: Shavand.
  • Basiri, Mohammad Sadegh; Amiri Khorasani, Ahmad & Fallah Lalehzari, Maliheh. (2014). “Spiritual Purification (Catharsis) in Nezami’s Khosrow and Shirin.” Journal of Persian Poetry and Prose Stylistics, Vol. 7(26), pp. 191–205.
  • Boothby, Richard. (2021). Death and Desire: Psychoanalytic Theory in Lacan’s Return to Freud. Trans. Ali Rostamian. Tehran: Bidgol.
  • Pourali, Hojatollah; Farahmand, Rouyintan & Narges Bagheri. (2014). “A Reading of Qa‘edey-e Bazi Based on Kristeva’s Theory of Abjection.” Journal of Fiction Studies, Vol. 2(2), pp. 26–39.
  • Servat, Mansour. (2011). Introduction to Literary Movements. 3rd ed. Tehran: Sokhan.
  • Chubak, Sadegh. (1990). The Baboon Whose Buffoon Was Dead. Los Angeles: Ketab Corp.
  • Hadaegh, Behi & Mobina Akbarzadeh. (2020). “The Concept of the Abject in Forough Farrokhzad’s Thought and Its Parallels with Kristeva’s Powers of Horror.” Comparative Literary Studies Journal, No. 54, pp. 97–118.
  • Hassanzadeh Mirali, Abdollah. (2013). Sadegh Chubak: A Pioneer of Naturalism in Iran. Semnan: Semnan University Press.
  • Hassanzadeh Mirali, Abdollah & Ma’soumeh Jom’eh. (2013). “Naturalism and Fable: A Study of Sadegh Chubak’s Works.” Journal of Literary History, No. 73, pp. 167–182.
  • Douglas, Mary. (2021). Purity and Danger: An Analysis of Concepts of Pollution and Taboo. Trans. Leila Ardabili. Tehran: Logos.
  • Radfar, Abolghasem. (2004). “A Comparative Analysis of Realism and Naturalism.” Journal of Literary Research, No. 3, pp. 29–44.
  • Zamani, Fatemeh. (2019). “A Mythological and Intertextual Reading of Heirani Based on Kristeva’s Theory of Abjection.” Journal of Mystical and Mythological Literature, Vol. 15(54), pp. 135–161.
  • Selden, Raman & Peter Widdowson. (1998). A Reader’s Guide to Contemporary Literary Theory. Trans. Abbas Mokhber. Tehran: Tarh-e No.
  • Salimi Kouchi, Ebrahim & Fatemeh Sokout Jahromi. (2014). “Applying Kristeva’s Abjection Theory to Forough Farrokhzad’s I Feel Sorry for the Garden.” Journal of Linguistic Studies, No. 17, pp. 89–106.
  • Seyyed Hosseini, Reza. (1997). Literary Schools, Vol. 1, 11th ed. Tehran: Negah.
  • Sadeghi Naqdali-Aliya, Fatemeh & Roghieh Bahadori. (2022). “An Analysis of Prince Ehtejab Based on Julia Kristeva’s Theory of Abjection.” Literary Criticism and Theory, Vol. 7(13), pp. 79–101.
  • Farzaneh Dehkordi, Jalal. (2019). “Addiction and Otherness: A Sociological Reading of the Film Woodpecker from the Perspective of Kristeva’s Abjection.” Journal of the Sociology of Art and Literature, No. 2, pp. 39–61.
  • Carter, David. (2016). Introducing Literary Theories. Trans. Fatemeh Mirzazadeh. Tehran: Parsik.
  • Makarik, Irene Rima. (2006). Encyclopedia of Contemporary Literary Theory. Trans. Mehran Mohajer & Mohammad Nabavi. Tehran: Agah.
  • McAfee, Noelle. (2021). Julia Kristeva. Trans. Mehrdad Parsa. Tehran: Markaz.
  • Mehrvar, Zakaria. (2004). Contemporary Iranian Fiction: From Style to Structure. Tehran: Tirgan.
  • Mollaei, Keramat. (2021). Freud–Lacan: Fundamentals of Psychoanalysis. 16th ed. Tehran: Ney.
  • Mirsadeghi, Jamal. (1998). “Fiction and Sadegh Chubak.” In: Ali Dehbashi (ed.), In Memory of Sadegh Chubak. Tehran: Saless, pp. 145–150.
  • Nabizadeh Nodehi, Rakhshandeh & Sheyda Ahmadzadeh Heravi. (2020). “Abjection, Confronting the Abject, and the Formation of Masculine Identity in Hamlet through Julia Kristeva’s Lens.” Foreign Languages and Literature Review, No. 24, pp. 307–326.
  • Vesal, Matin & Atieh Arabi. (2023). “The Abject and the Sublime in Atieh Attarzadeh’s How to Die with Medicinal Plants: An Abject Reading Based on Julia Kristeva’s Approach.” Persian Contemporary Literature Biannual, Vol. 13(2), pp. 293–314.
  • Childers, Joseph & Hentzi, Gary. (1995). The Columbia Dictionary of Modern Literary and Cultural Criticism. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Kristeva, Julia. (1982). Powers of Horror: An Essay on Abjection. Translated by Leon S. Roudiez. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Lacan, Jacques. (1977). Écrits: A Selection. Translated by Alan Sheridan. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
  • Tyler, Imogen. (2009). “Against Abjection.” Feminist Theory, 10(1), 77–98.
  • Childers, Joseph & Hentzi, Gray. (1995). The Columbia Dictionary of Modern Literary and Cultural Criticism. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Kristeva, J. (1982). Powers of Horror: An Essay on Abjection. Translated by Leon S. Roudiez. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Lacan, Jacaques. (1977). Ecrits: A Selection. Translated by Alan Sheridan. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
  • Tyler, Imogen. (2009). "Against Abjection", Feminist Theory, 10(1), 77-98.