Journal of the stylistic of Persian poem and prose
volume Number 17، number In Volume 7، October 2024 ، issue Number 101

Analysis And Review The Dramatic Aspects Debate Between Khosrow With Farhad In Khosrow And Shirin Nizami With The Center Of Dialogue

Fatemeh Modarresi (Author in Charge), Kamal Rasoulian

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Dialogue, a French word derived from Greek meaning dialogue, is the words that are exchanged between the characters of a play. Dialogue is the most important part of a show and the characters of any drama are developed and developed through this technique. Read any literary work as a dialogue between two or more characters.

METHODOLOGY: In this research, by referring to library sources and using a descriptive-analytical method, an attempt is made to investigate and analyze the tragic and dramatic aspects of Khosrow"s debate with Farhad in Khosrow and Shirin Nizami in its traditional form and centered on dialogue.

FINDINGS: Debate writing literary type is one of the formats and methods of Persian poetry and prose, which debate poets and writers generally use this literary form in different forms such as traditional (dialogue between individuals) and new (monologue) to express themselves. They use various examples such as advice, wisdom, ethics, feelings and social issues. Debate is often created by using question and answer tools, and each questioner or answerer in their desired position should get out of the dilemma of the debate with the rules of debates. Khosrow"s debate with Farhad is one of the most famous debates in Persian literature, in which Nizami has been able to show in the best possible way the conflicts between representatives of the two rich and poor classes of his time, "Khosrow and Farhad".

CONCLUSION: The heterogeneity of the position of the parties in the debate makes the issue of conflict and duality more prominent in the existence of the figures of the narrative and causes this debate to end tragically and unfairly; Because the two sides of the debate present their dialogues from two different positions.

Keyword
Nizami , Khosrow and Shirin , Khosrow and Farhad , dramatic , dialogue , debate.

• Anvari, Hassan. (2002). Great speech culture. The seventh volume.Tehran: Nashr-e Sokhan.
• Anoushe, Hassan. (2002). Dictionary of Persian literature. The second volume. Tehran: Farhang-o- Ershad-e Eslami.
• Dad, Sima. (2006). Dictionary of literary terms. Tehran: Morvarid.
• Elias bin Yusuf, Mohammad. (1956). Generalities of Diwan Hakim Nizami Ganjaei. From the corrected text of Vahid Dastgerdi, Amir Kabir Press Institute.
• Ghunaymi Hilal, Muhammad. (1994). A Comparative literature. Translated by Seyyed Morteza Ayatollahzadeh Shirazi. Tehran: Amir-Kabir.
• Ḥamīdiyān, Saʻīd. (2023). Khosrow and Shirin, With corrections and margins by Hassan Vahid Dastgerdi, 23rd edition, Tehran: Qatre publication.
• Imen, Leyli. (1973). A passage in children's literature. Book Council. Tehran: Offset printing.
• Mirsadeghi, Jamal. (2015). Story elements. Ninth edition. Tehran: Nashr-e Sokhan.
• Najm, Muḥammad Yūsuf. (1966). The art of story. Fifth edition. Beirut: Dar El Thaqafa.
• Pandari Jalali, Yadullah. (1999). A selection of poems by Parvin E'tesami.Tehran: Morvarid.
• Raduyani, Muhammad. (1995). Tarjoman-Ol- Balaghe. Ateş, Ahmad edition: 3.
• Rastegar, Mansour. (1993). Types of Persian poetry. Shiraz: Navid-e Shiraz.
• Safa, Zabihollah. (1992). History of literature in Iran. Fifth Edition. Nashr- e Ferdows.
• Sartre, Jean-Paul. (1969). What is literature? Translated by Aboul-hassan Najafi, Mostafa Rahimi. Tehran: Niloufar.
• Shamīsā, Sīrūs. ( 2008). Literary types. Fourth edition. Tehran: Mitra.
• Stan, Allen. Savannah, George. (2005). Text semiotics and theater performance, Translated by Zinlou, Dawoud. Tehran: Soure-ye Mehr.
• Tamimdari, Ahmad. (1998). Iranian stories. Islamic Propaganda Organization(Sazman-e Tablighat –e Eslami).
• Yousefi, Gholamhossein. ( 2009). Bright Fountain(Cheshme-Roshan/A meeting with poets(. Tehran: Elmi Publications.
• Zarrinkoub, Abdolhossein. (1975). literary criticism. Tehran: amir-kabir publications.
• Rasoulian, Kamal. (2023). The role of literature in strengthening the national identity and language of a nation by relying on Shahnameh and Kushnameh, Mohaghegh Ardabili University, International Conference on Comparative Fiction Literature Research, winter 2023.
• Zabihi, Rahman and the others. ( 2023). Analysis of the debate between Khosrow and Farhad as narrated by Nizami Ganjavi and Khanai Ghobadi from the point of view of Grice's principles of cooperation, Kurdish literature research paper, spring and summer 2023, ninth year, number 1, in a row, Pages 97-112.
• Gadamer, Hans-Georg. (Spring 2000). Life: not lingering and meditation in language "thoughts about language and literature" translated by Mohammad Farmani, Namah al-Falshaf( Philosophy letter). Number 9, Pages 67-74.
• Ghanipour, Malikshah And The Others. (2023). Analysis and review of Khosrow and Shirin Nizami focusing on the debate between Khosrow and Farhad using the components of Fairclough critical discourse analysis approach. Ancient History of Persian Literature, Research Institute of Humanities and Cultural Studies, year 14, Number 1, Spring&Summer 2023, Pages 347-368.
• Modarresi, Fatemeh And Rasoulian Kamal. (2023). Examining today's unused words in Rudaki's poems. International scientific-specialist quarterly of Persian language studies(Shafay-e Del-e Sabegh). Sixth year, number thirteen, spring 2023, Pages 73-94.
• Norouzi, Zeinab. (2009). Structural criticism of the debate between Khosrow and Farhad in the lyrical system of Khosrow and Shirin, Sistan and Baluchistan University's research paper on lyrical literature, 7th year, 12th issue, spring and summer 2009, Pages 159-178.