- Count View : 207
- آدرس کوتاه شده مقاله: https://bahareadab.com/article_id/1678
- کد doi مقاله: Doi: 10.22034/bahareadab.2024 .17 .7457
Journal of the stylistic of Persian poem and prose
volume Number 17،
number In Volume 6،
،
issue Number 100
Criticism of the book of chivalry by Henry Carbon based on the components of critical thinking
Seyedah Najmeh Hosseini , Nematoleh Iranzadeh (Author in Charge), Fereshte Nabati
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The book of chivalry by Henry Carbone is a collection of analysis and review of seven fatut letters, which include customs related to chivalry, moral teachings and practical wisdom. The author has a special attitude in this book and proves his theory with successive arguments.
METHODOLOGY: This article aims to identify the author"s research method by examining the style of discussion and how the author"s arguments are. In the direction of this identification, first the main statement that the author tried to prove was identified. Then the related arguments were extracted and evaluated based on the components of critical thinking.
FINDINGS: Findings: Among the components of critical thinking, the most important features of Carbone"s arguments and his definitions are clarity, communication and breadth of opinion.
CONCLUSION: The result obtained from this research is that before entering the discussion, Karbon first defines the concepts and terms used. Then, by stating the premises, he builds his argument and finally summarizes his argument with a few short and clear sentences.
Keyword
Henry Carbone
, tAyeene javanmardi
, critical thinking
, research method
, reasoning
- Elder, Linda and Paul, Richard (2017). Critical thinking, translated by Akbar Soltani and Maryam Aghazadeh, Tehran: Akhtaran, pp. 117-127
- Taskhiri, Mohammad Ali (2007). Speeches about the approximation of religions, Andishah Al-Karam magazine, number 14, page 7-41
- Khodadadi, Amir. (2013). Dissertation "Investigating the place of critical thinking in the content of religious education books of the middle school course, Allameh Tabatabai University, p. 13
- Khansari, Mohammad. (1366). Formal Logic (Vol. 2), Tehran: Agha, pp. 128-133
- Fisher, R. (2016). Teaching thinking to children, translated by Masoud Safai Moghadam and Afshana Najarian, Ahvaz: Resesh, p.5
- Ghazi Moradi, Hassan. (2014). An introduction to critical thinking, Tehran: Akhtaran, pp. 219-31
- Carbon, Henry. (1363) . The religion of chivalry, translated by Ehsan Naraghi, Tehran: New Publishing
- Lublan, Gilles. (2013). Thinking clearly, a guide to critical thinking, translated by Mehdi Khosravani, Tehran: Goman
- Maarofi et al. (2008). The place of critical thinking in the content of the social studies book of secondary school, Humanities Research Journal, 10th year, number 26, pp. 265-249
- Nebati, Angel. (1385). A comparison between inferring the best explanation and conjecture, Mishkoh Al-Noor, No. 35, p. 1
- Nazarnejad, Narges. (2008). The nature and types of definition, Tabriz: Yas Nabi, p. 79